Home / States / Colorado
📍 Colorado · Third-Party DV State · Larson v. Long (1923) · Pattern Civil Jury Instructions

Colorado Diminished Value Claims — The Complete Guide.

Colorado has supported DV recovery since Larson v. Long (1923) and clarified the measure of damages in Trujillo v. Wilson (1948). The state's Pattern Civil Jury Instructions codify the calculation method. Modified comparative negligence (50%+ bars recovery) provides a softer landing than NC/VA's pure contributory negligence rule.

Recovery
Third-Party Only
Statute of Limitations
3 Years
Small Claims Limit
$7,500
Negligence Rule
Modified (50% bar)

Colorado's Century-Old Framework.

Colorado's DV law rests on two Colorado Supreme Court decisions: Larson v. Long (1923), which established that depreciation evidence is admissible as an element of damage, and Trujillo v. Wilson (1948), which clarified the measure of damages as "the difference between [the property's] value immediately before its damage and immediately thereafter, together with any expense of reasonable efforts to preserve or restore it." These decisions remain controlling.

Notably, Colorado's Pattern Civil Jury Instructions explicitly direct juries on how to calculate DV — instructing them to award compensation equal to the difference between the property's market value immediately before and after the accident. This jury-instruction framework gives Colorado DV claimants a clear standard that insurers must answer to. Colorado applies modified comparative negligence under C.R.S. § 13-21-111, which means recovery is barred only if you're 50% or more at fault.

The Colorado standard, in one line
Pre-accident value minus post-repair value. Larson, Trujillo, and the Pattern Jury Instructions all converge on this measure.

Colorado Authority: 100 Years of Case Law

Colorado's DV framework is built on two Colorado Supreme Court decisions, codified in the Pattern Jury Instructions, and constrained by the modified comparative negligence statute.

Larson v. Long, 74 Colo. 152 (1923)
Colorado's foundational DV decision.
The Colorado Supreme Court in Larson v. Long held that evidence of the depreciation in value of an automobile on account of its having been in an accident is admissible — the depreciation being an element of damage. This 1923 decision established the foundational principle that DV is recoverable in Colorado. The state's appellate courts have not disturbed this principle in the century since.
✓ Colorado DV recovery rests on Larson. Insurers cannot credibly argue DV is unrecognized in Colorado.
Trujillo v. Wilson, 117 Colo. 430, 189 P.2d 147 (Colo. 1948)
The measure of damages: pre- minus post-loss value.
The Colorado Supreme Court in Trujillo v. Wilson set out the controlling measure of damages: "The measure of damage is the difference between its value immediately before its damage and immediately thereafter, together with any expense of reasonable efforts to preserve or restore it." This decision establishes that recovery includes both the diminished value AND reasonable repair expense. Trujillo remains the controlling authority and is routinely cited in Colorado DV demand letters and litigation.
✓ Quote Trujillo's exact language. The damages framework is well-settled and not in serious dispute.
Colorado Pattern Civil Jury Instructions (CJI-Civ.)
Juries are instructed to award DV directly.
Colorado's Pattern Civil Jury Instructions codify the DV calculation: juries are instructed to award compensation equal to the difference between the property's market value immediately before and after the accident. This is a meaningful procedural advantage — Colorado DV claims that reach a jury are decided under a clear, uniform standard. The pattern instructions also signal to insurers that any litigated case will produce a structured, predictable outcome based on market evidence.
✓ The Pattern Jury Instructions remove ambiguity. Reference them in demand letters to demonstrate awareness of how a Colorado jury would decide.
C.R.S. § 13-80-101 & § 13-21-111 (SOL & Comparative Negligence)
Three-year SOL plus modified comparative negligence.
Colorado's statute of limitations for tort actions arising out of motor vehicle use is three years under C.R.S. § 13-80-101(1)(n). Modified comparative negligence under C.R.S. § 13-21-111 reduces recovery proportionally to your fault percentage but bars recovery entirely if you're 50% or more at fault. This is significantly more forgiving than Virginia or North Carolina's pure contributory negligence rules. A claimant 30% at fault still recovers 70% of DV; a claimant 49% at fault still recovers 51%.
✓ Modified comparative is meaningful. Even shared-fault accidents can support partial Colorado DV recovery.

17c Conflicts With Colorado's Pattern Jury Instructions.

Colorado's Pattern Jury Instructions direct juries to compare pre-accident and post-repair market value — a direct, market-based standard. The 17c formula's mechanical multipliers don't match this standard. State Farm and other major Colorado insurers default to 17c anyway. A demand letter that contrasts the Pattern Jury Instruction standard against 17c demonstrates that you understand how a Colorado jury would actually decide your claim.

Run 17c yourself to anticipate the insurer's initial offer, then compare against the Pattern Jury Instruction's market-based measure in your appraisal:

17c Formula Calculator
Run the 17c formula that most major auto insurers use to evaluate diminished value claims. Compare it against actual market-based loss.
17c Formula Result
$0
What the insurer will offer
Market-Based DV
$0
What you're actually owed
Note: Industry-standard formula not adopted by any state DOI.
Get a Defensible Market-Based Appraisal — $149.99

Filing a Diminished Value Claim in Colorado.

Colorado's framework is well-settled. Three Colorado Supreme Court / appellate authorities (Larson, Trujillo, the Pattern Jury Instructions) align on the measure of damages. The 3-year SOL provides reasonable time. Modified comparative negligence allows partial recovery in shared-fault situations.

  1. Document liability. Colorado's modified comparative negligence is more forgiving than VA/NC's pure contributory rule, but fault percentage still affects recovery. Police report, witness statements, and any available camera footage establish your fault percentage.
  2. Complete repairs. Colorado DV is calculated post-repair. Document repairs: estimates, invoices, parts list, scan reports, paint thickness, frame measurements.
  3. Establish pre-accident market value. Colorado-market comparables — Denver, Aurora, Colorado Springs, Fort Collins, Lakewood, Boulder. Mountain region buyers (Vail, Aspen, Steamboat) often pay premium for AWD/4x4 vehicles.
  4. Document the post-repair value. Two written dealer trade-in offers post-repair plus comparable sales of similar Colorado vehicles with accident-history Carfax. Discount typically runs 12-22%.
  5. Prepare a USPAP-compliant appraisal. The appraisal cites Larson v. Long and Trujillo v. Wilson, uses Colorado-market comparables, and aligns with the Pattern Civil Jury Instructions' standard.
  6. Send a demand letter. Cite both Larson and Trujillo. Reference the Pattern Jury Instructions to signal your awareness of how a Colorado jury would decide. Note the 3-year SOL window. Send certified mail.
  7. Allow 30 days for response. Colorado insurers familiar with the controlling case law typically respond within 14-30 days.
  8. File a Colorado Division of Insurance complaint. doi.colorado.gov handles consumer complaints. DOI complaints add regulatory pressure.
  9. Small claims for $7,500 or less; county court above. Colorado small claims is capped at $7,500 (C.R.S. § 13-6-403). No attorneys allowed in small claims. County court handles up to $25,000.
  10. Consider district court for larger claims. Above $25,000, Colorado district court handles the case with full procedure. Most DV claims fit within county court's $25,000 jurisdiction.
The Colorado Pattern Jury Instructions reference
Citing the Pattern Civil Jury Instructions in your demand letter signals you've thought about trial. Insurers settle more readily when claimants demonstrate awareness of the litigation endgame.

Colorado DV Questions

Can I recover diminished value in Colorado?
Yes, third-party only. Larson v. Long, 74 Colo. 152 (1923), and Trujillo v. Wilson, 117 Colo. 430 (1948), are the controlling Colorado Supreme Court decisions. Colorado has supported DV recovery for over 100 years.
What is Colorado's statute of limitations?
Three years from the date of the accident for motor vehicle tort claims under C.R.S. § 13-80-101(1)(n). Some sources confuse this with the general two-year tort SOL (§ 13-80-102), but the motor vehicle provision controls.
Does Colorado UMPD cover DV?
Generally no. Colorado's UM/UIM statute primarily covers bodily injury. Optional UMPD applies when no collision coverage is carried, but DV coverage depends on policy wording — most exclude it.
What is Colorado's small claims limit?
$7,500 under C.R.S. § 13-6-403. Attorneys are not allowed to represent parties in small claims. County court handles up to $25,000.
What if I'm partially at fault for the accident?
Colorado applies modified comparative negligence under C.R.S. § 13-21-111. Recovery is reduced proportionally to your fault percentage; recovery is barred entirely if you're 50% or more at fault. A claimant 30% at fault recovers 70% of DV.
What about first-party DV in Colorado?
Generally not available unless the policy expressly provides for it. Lovell v. State Farm (10th Cir. 2006) confirmed Colorado does not imply DV coverage into standard collision forms.

100 Years of Colorado DV Law — Use It.

Larson, Trujillo, and the Pattern Jury Instructions converge on a market-based standard. A USPAP-compliant appraisal that cites this authority is the foundation of recovery.

Get Your Free Diminished Value Estimate

Our quick and simple appraisal process can help you recoup vehicle-related losses.