Home / States / Tennessee
📍 Tennessee · Limited Third-Party DV State · GEICO v. Bloodworth (2007) · Grimes v. Hancock (2012)

Tennessee Diminished Value Claims — The Complete Guide.

Tennessee is the most restrictive DV state we cover. GEICO v. Bloodworth (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007) established that DV is recoverable as a class action framework. But Grimes v. Hancock (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012) clarified that recovery is either repair costs or the difference in market value before and after — not both. This forces an either/or election that benefits insurers.

Recovery
Limited Third-Party
Statute of Limitations
3 Years
Small Claims Limit
$25,000
Recovery Choice
Repair OR DV (Not Both)

Tennessee's Either-Or Recovery Limitation.

Tennessee is unique among the states we cover in limiting DV recovery to an either-or election. The Tennessee Court of Appeals in Grimes v. Hancock (M2011-01940-COA-R3-CV, June 2012) held: "the measure of damages is either repair costs or the difference in market value immediately before the accident and that immediately after the accident. It is not both. Unlike the Restatement provision, decrease in value measured after the repair is not a recognized element of allowable damages in Tennessee."

This makes Tennessee less favorable than the both-elements states (Ohio, Illinois, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland). Tennessee claimants must choose: either accept repair costs (typically what the insurer pays) OR pursue the gross diminution (pre- minus post-accident market value). The earlier GEICO v. Bloodworth class action framework still applies as the procedural baseline, and Tennessee UMPD coverage can include DV as optional coverage. T.C.A. § 28-3-105 provides a 3-year SOL.

Tennessee's either-or rule
Repair costs OR pre-/post-accident market value difference — not both. Grimes v. Hancock (2012) controls. This forces strategic choices that benefit insurers.

Tennessee's Two-Decision Framework

Tennessee DV law rests on a 2007 class action and a 2012 limiting decision. The framework is restrictive compared to most states.

GEICO General Insurance Co. v. Bloodworth, No. M2003-02986-COA-R10-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007)
Class action framework establishing DV recovery elements.
The Tennessee Court of Appeals in GEICO v. Bloodworth addressed a class action over DV claims and set out the elements: "whether any particular class member can recover diminished value damages under Tennessee law would depend upon proof of: (1) the vehicle's pre-accident condition and value, (2) the vehicle's post-accident value, and (3) proof that the repair did not restore the vehicle to substantially the same value it had before the accident." Bloodworth established that DV is recoverable in Tennessee subject to specific proof requirements.
✓ Bloodworth provides the elements framework. Three-step proof: pre-accident value, post-accident value, repair didn't restore value.
Grimes v. Hancock, No. M2011-01940-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012)
Either repair costs OR market difference — not both.
The Tennessee Court of Appeals in Grimes v. Hancock imposed the either-or limitation: "the measure of damages is either repair costs or the difference in market value immediately before the accident and that immediately after the accident. It is not both. Unlike the Restatement provision, decrease in value measured after the repair is not a recognized element of allowable damages in Tennessee." Grimes distinguishes Tennessee from Restatement § 928 jurisdictions (PA, IL, IN, etc.) by foreclosing the both-elements recovery.
✓ Grimes is restrictive. Tennessee claimants must choose between repair costs and gross diminution, not both.
T.C.A. § 28-3-105 (Statute of Limitations)
Three-year SOL for property damage tort actions.
Tennessee's SOL for property damage tort actions is three years under T.C.A. § 28-3-105. (Note: T.C.A. § 28-3-104(a)(1) provides a one-year SOL for personal injury, but property damage including DV gets the longer 3-year window.) Practical implication: appraisal and demand should be completed within 24 months to leave a 12-month buffer for any necessary litigation.
✓ 3-year SOL gives reasonable time despite restrictive substantive law.
Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-7-1201 (UMPD)
Optional UMPD coverage may cover DV.
Tennessee allows optional UMPD coverage that may include DV depending on policy language. Coverage isn't automatic — verify your specific policy. UMPD provides a recovery path for hit-and-run and uninsured-driver scenarios in Tennessee, partially compensating for Grimes's restrictive third-party framework.
✓ UMPD coverage isn't automatic in Tennessee. Verify policy language for hit-and-run scenarios.

Tennessee's Calculation: Pick the Higher One.

Under Grimes, Tennessee claimants choose between (1) reasonable repair costs and (2) the difference in market value before and after the accident. The calculator shows the market difference. Compare against the actual repair cost to determine which is higher — that's the recoverable amount under Grimes. In most cases, the gross-diminution measure produces a larger number than repair costs alone, so the calculator's output is typically the right basis for the demand.

Calculate the gross diminution. Compare against repair costs. Demand the higher of the two:

17c Formula Calculator
Run the 17c formula that most major auto insurers use to evaluate diminished value claims. Compare it against actual market-based loss.
17c Formula Result
$0
What the insurer will offer
Market-Based DV
$0
What you're actually owed
Note: Industry-standard formula not adopted by any state DOI.
Get a Defensible Market-Based Appraisal — $149.99

Filing a Diminished Value Claim in Tennessee.

Tennessee's restrictive framework requires careful claim structuring. The either-or election under Grimes is the central procedural choice.

  1. Document liability. Tennessee applies modified comparative negligence — recovery barred at 50%+ fault, reduced proportionally below that. Police report, witnesses, dashcam.
  2. Complete repairs. Tennessee DV is calculated post-repair. Document the repair cost separately because under Grimes, you'll choose between repair cost and market diminution.
  3. Establish pre-accident market value. Tennessee-market comparables — Nashville, Memphis, Knoxville, Chattanooga, Clarksville. TN's growing population (especially Nashville metro) produces dense comparable data.
  4. Document post-accident market value. Critical for Tennessee under Grimes: you need pre-accident AND post-accident market values to establish the gross diminution measure. The post-repair value is also relevant for showing the repair didn't restore the vehicle.
  5. Compare repair cost vs. gross diminution. Under Grimes, you must elect one. Calculate both. Demand the higher amount.
  6. Prepare a USPAP-compliant appraisal. The appraisal cites GEICO v. Bloodworth for the three-element proof framework, addresses Grimes's either-or rule, and produces both the gross diminution number and repair cost figure.
  7. Send a demand letter. Cite Bloodworth for the proof framework. Address Grimes by demanding the higher of (1) repair cost or (2) gross diminution. Send certified mail.
  8. Allow 30 days for response. Tennessee insurers typically respond within 14-30 days. Be prepared for the insurer to argue for the lower of the two measures.
  9. File a Tennessee Department of Commerce and Insurance complaint. tn.gov/commerce handles complaints. TDCI complaints add regulatory pressure.
  10. Small claims (General Sessions Court) for $25,000 or less. Tennessee General Sessions Court handles civil claims up to $25,000 — one of the highest small claims caps in the country. Attorneys are permitted. Most TN DV claims fit within this jurisdiction.
Tennessee's high small claims cap is a procedural advantage
$25,000 in General Sessions Court is the highest small claims cap among the states we cover. Even with Grimes's restrictive substantive law, Tennessee's procedural accessibility (high cap, attorneys allowed, fast resolution) helps offset the limitation.

Tennessee DV Questions

Can I recover diminished value in Tennessee?
Yes, but with limitations. GEICO v. Bloodworth (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007) establishes the recovery framework. Grimes v. Hancock (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012) limits recovery to either repair costs OR the difference in pre-/post-accident market value — not both. This is more restrictive than Restatement § 928 states.
What's Tennessee's either-or rule?
Under Grimes v. Hancock, Tennessee claimants must elect between (1) reasonable repair costs and (2) the difference in market value immediately before and immediately after the accident. Unlike PA, IL, NJ, MD, and OH (where both repair cost and residual diminution are recoverable), Tennessee permits only one measure.
What is Tennessee's statute of limitations?
Three years from the date of the accident under T.C.A. § 28-3-105 for property damage tort actions.
Does Tennessee UMPD cover DV?
Optional. Tennessee allows UMPD coverage that may include DV depending on policy language. Verify your policy.
What is Tennessee's small claims limit?
$25,000 in General Sessions Court — the highest small claims cap among the states we cover. Attorneys are permitted.
Why is Tennessee considered restrictive?
The Grimes either-or rule means Tennessee claimants typically recover less than claimants in both-elements states (Restatement § 928 jurisdictions). The combined recovery of repair cost plus residual diminution available in PA, IL, NJ, MD, and OH is not available in Tennessee.

Either-Or. Pick the Larger Recovery.

Tennessee's either-or rule under Grimes means claimants must elect. A USPAP-compliant appraisal documents both repair costs and gross diminution so you can choose the larger.

Get Your Free Diminished Value Estimate

Our quick and simple appraisal process can help you recoup vehicle-related losses.