Home / States / Maine
📍 Maine · Third-Party DV Recoverable · Modified Comparative · 6-Year SOL

Maine Diminished Value Claims — The Complete Guide.

Maine recognizes the market value your vehicle lost after an accident as recoverable property damage, with case law going back decades: the Maine Supreme Judicial Court held in Collins v. Kelley that vehicle damage is measured by the difference in value before and after, and that repair cost is not the last word. Maine also gives you one of the longest windows in the country, six years, to act. Recovery is a third-party claim against the at-fault driver's insurer.

DV Recognized
Third-Party
Statute of Limitations
6 Years
Fault Rule
Modified (50% bar)
Precedent
Collins v. Kelley (1935)
Get Your Diminished Value Report USPAP-compliant appraisal. Three tiers from $49.99.

A Recognized Loss, and a Long Runway.

Maine treats the residual drop in your vehicle's market value after a proper repair as compensable property damage when another driver is at fault, and it has long-standing case law saying so. In Collins v. Kelley, the Maine Supreme Judicial Court held that the established rule for vehicle damage is recovery of the difference in the car's value before and after the accident, and that the cost of repairs, while an important factor, is not conclusive. Recovery is pursued against the at-fault driver's liability insurer.

So if you were rear-ended in Portland, Lewiston, Bangor, South Portland, Auburn, or Augusta and your car was properly repaired, the at-fault driver's insurer owes you the gap between your vehicle's pre-accident market value and its lower post-repair value, and Maine gives you up to six years to pursue it.

Two Maine features worth knowing
First, the six-year clock (14 M.R.S. § 752) is one of the most generous in the country, far longer than the two- or three-year windows most states impose. Second, Maine's comparative-fault rule reduces a recovery in an unusual way: instead of cutting your award by a strict percentage of fault, a Maine jury reduces the total damages in dollars, to the extent it considers just and equitable given your share of responsibility. The 50% bar still applies (you recover only if you were under 50% at fault), but the reduction itself is an equitable judgment, not a rigid formula.

Three facts define a Maine DV claim:

1. The right is well-grounded. Maine case law (Collins v. Kelley; Moore v. Daggett) measures vehicle damage by the before-and-after value difference, with repair cost not as a ceiling, so the existence of the right is rarely the fight, the amount is.

2. The clock is long, six years. Maine's statute of limitations for property damage (and personal injury) is six years (14 M.R.S. § 752), among the longest anywhere.

3. Fault is apportioned, with a 50% bar and an equitable reduction. You recover if under 50% at fault; the jury then reduces the award in dollars as it considers just and equitable.

The Rules That Govern Maine DV Claims

Maine's framework is favorable: long-standing precedent measuring vehicle damage by the before-and-after value difference, a generous six-year window, and a modified-comparative rule with an unusual equitable reduction. The open question is the amount, which a credible appraisal is built to settle.

Collins v. Kelley, 133 Me. 410 (Me. 1935) · Moore v. Daggett, 129 Me. 488, 150 A. 538
Vehicle damage is the difference in value before and after, repair cost is not conclusive.
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court established that, in cases involving damage to motor vehicles, the long-settled rule is that the owner recovers the difference between the vehicle's value before the accident and its value afterward. The cost of repairs may be an important element in determining that figure, but it is not conclusive, the court was explicit that repairs are not the ceiling on recovery. That is precisely the diminished value principle: a quality repair that still leaves the car worth less means the owner is owed the residual difference. Having this stated in a state high court decision puts the Maine DV right on firm footing.
✓ A not-at-fault Maine driver can recover the documented before-and-after value difference, the diminished value, from the at-fault driver's insurer, with repair cost not capping the claim.
14 M.R.S. § 156 — Modified Comparative Negligence (50% Bar, Equitable Reduction)
Recover if under 50% at fault; the reduction is equitable, not a fixed percentage.
Maine follows modified comparative negligence: a claimant whose fault is 50% or more is barred, but if under 50%, recovery is allowed and then reduced. What sets Maine apart is the reduction mechanism. Rather than cutting the award by the claimant's exact percentage of fault, the statute directs the jury to reduce the total damages in dollars, to the extent considered just and equitable, having regard to the claimant's share in the responsibility. So in Maine a 20%-at-fault claimant is not automatically docked exactly 20%, the jury sets a dollar reduction it deems fair. For diminished value, a clean not-at-fault accident still carries the full claim.
⚠ Barred at 50%+; under 50% you recover, reduced by an amount the jury considers just and equitable, not a rigid percentage.
14 M.R.S. § 752 — Six-Year Statute of Limitations
Six years from the accident, one of the longest windows anywhere.
Maine's general civil statute of limitations gives six years to file a claim for property damage, including diminished value, and the same six-year period governs personal-injury claims (14 M.R.S. § 752). This is far more runway than the two- or three-year windows most states impose, a real advantage if life gets in the way. Still, document early: comparable-sales evidence is strongest soon after the loss, and waiting risks losing photographs, repair records, and reliable market data.
✓ Six years under § 752, among the most generous in the country. Document early anyway, evidence is freshest right after the loss.
Third-Party Primary · First-Party Exclusion · Release Caution
DV runs against the at-fault driver, and a "payment in full" check can waive it.
Maine diminished value is a third-party claim against the at-fault driver's liability insurer. Most first-party collision policies exclude DV, and whether your own uninsured/underinsured-motorist coverage would pay DV (if the at-fault driver was uninsured) is uncertain in Maine and policy-dependent, read your declarations page, do not assume it. One important caution: payment for repairs does not automatically include diminished value, and accepting a check marked "payment in full" or signing a broad release can forfeit your right to recover DV. Keep the DV claim explicitly open.
⚠ Third-party primary; first-party collision excludes DV and UM is uncertain. Don't cash a "payment in full" repair check, it can waive your DV claim.
Maine Pattern Analysis
Maine DV claims sit on solid footing: Collins v. Kelley establishes the before-and-after measure with repair cost not as a cap, and the six-year clock removes time pressure. Because the right is grounded, insurers rarely deny that DV exists, they argue the amount, often opening with a low 17c number. The decisive countermove is a USPAP-grade appraisal built on real Maine comparable sales, condition and mileage adjustments, and shown calculations, which both satisfies Maine's proof requirement and beats the 17c anchor. Keep liability under 50% and avoid signing away the claim in a repair settlement, and the documented number controls.

Insurers May Quote 17c in Maine — But It Has No Legal Force Here.

The 17c formula originated in Georgia's State Farm v. Mabry settlement and carries no statutory or precedential weight in Maine. Maine measures the loss as the difference in the vehicle's value before and after the accident (Collins v. Kelley), so an insurer that opens with a 17c-based number is offering a negotiating anchor, not applying Maine law.

That cuts in your favor. The 17c formula caps DV at a small fraction of pre-accident value and applies aggressive damage and mileage modifiers, so its output is almost always far below the true market loss a comparable-sales analysis documents. Because Maine measures the loss as the full before-and-after difference, with repair cost not conclusive, an insurer's 17c offer is simply the floor of the negotiation. Run the number so you know what they are anchoring to, then counter with market evidence of the actual loss.

17c calculator

See what a 17c-based offer looks like, then compare it against the market-based loss your Maine claim can actually document and recover.

17c Formula Calculator
Run the 17c formula that most major auto insurers use to evaluate diminished value claims. Compare it against actual market-based loss.
17c Formula Result
$0
What the insurer will offer
Market-Based DV
$0
What you're actually owed
Note: Industry-standard formula not adopted by any state DOI.
Get a Defensible Market-Based Appraisal — $149.99

Filing a Diminished Value Claim in Maine.

Maine recognizes your right to recover the value your vehicle lost from the at-fault party, with precedent behind it and a long six-year window. The process is about building credible evidence, pressing a documented demand, and not signing away the claim in a repair settlement.

  1. Identify the at-fault driver and your lane. Maine DV is a third-party claim against the at-fault driver's liability insurer. First-party collision generally excludes DV, and UM coverage for DV is uncertain in Maine, so a clear at-fault, insured other driver is the foundation.
  2. Do not cash a "payment in full" repair check. Payment for repairs does not include diminished value. Accepting a check marked as full settlement, or signing a broad release, can forfeit your DV claim. Keep the DV claim explicitly open from the start.
  3. Complete repairs and gather documentation. The crash report, repair invoices, pre- and post-repair photographs, and a Carfax/accident-history record establish both the loss and the liability picture.
  4. Establish pre-accident market value (PAMV). Use actual comparable sales from Maine markets, Portland, Lewiston, Bangor, Augusta. Local comparable sales control; book values are only a starting point.
  5. Commission a USPAP-grade valuation report. Collins v. Kelley requires proof the value was diminished (repair cost alone is not conclusive), so the appraisal does double duty: it proves the loss and sets the number. The report must show comparable selection, condition and mileage adjustments, and working calculations.
  6. Send a written demand with the appraisal attached. Cite Maine's before-and-after measure (Collins v. Kelley), frame the loss as the difference in value the repair could not restore, state your documented number, attach the appraisal, and set a reasonable response deadline.
  7. Counter the 17c lowball with market evidence. Expect a 17c-based offer. Do not argue the formula on its own terms, replace it with your comparable-sales analysis, which reflects the actual market loss Maine recognizes.
  8. Mind comparative fault. If some fault may be assigned to you, remember Maine bars recovery at 50% and reduces an allowed recovery by an amount the jury considers just and equitable. Build the liability record carefully.
  9. Escalate to the Maine Bureau of Insurance if needed. The Bureau takes consumer complaints about insurer claims handling. A complaint frequently moves a stalled or unreasonably low claim.
  10. Consider small claims, and use the long clock wisely. Maine small claims court handles disputes up to $6,000, a fast, attorney-optional venue. The SOL is six years (14 M.R.S. § 752), but document early regardless, evidence is freshest soon after the loss.
The single most valuable Maine move
Put a credible, USPAP-grade valuation report on file, and don't sign away the claim first. Maine's Collins v. Kelley already establishes the before-and-after measure with repair cost not as a cap, and the six-year clock gives you room, so the documented comparable-sales number is what turns that recognized right into a four-figure settlement instead of a token 17c offer. Just be sure a repair "payment in full" hasn't quietly waived it.

Documented Number, Claim Kept Open.

Maine gives you a recognized right with precedent behind it and the longest clock in the region. Three things determine how much you collect:

1. The quality of your valuation evidence. Collins v. Kelley requires proof the value dropped (repairs are not conclusive), so a USPAP-grade report with real Maine comparable sales is what satisfies the rule and beats the 17c anchor.

2. Keeping the claim open. Because a "payment in full" repair check or broad release can waive DV, the most common way Maine claims are lost is by accidentally settling them, keep the DV piece explicitly alive.

3. Fault. You recover if under 50% at fault; the jury then reduces an allowed award in dollars as it considers just and equitable, so a clean liability record protects the full number.

Maine Diminished Value Questions.

Can I recover diminished value in Maine?
Yes, as a third-party claim if another driver was at fault. Maine's Supreme Judicial Court established long ago, in Collins v. Kelley (133 Me. 410, 1935), that recovery for vehicle damage is measured by the difference in the car's value before and after the accident, and that the cost of repairs, while important, is not the conclusive measure. That before-and-after measure supports recovering the post-repair loss in market value from the at-fault driver's insurer.
How does Maine's comparative negligence rule affect my claim?
Maine uses modified comparative negligence with a 50% bar (14 M.R.S. § 156): you recover only if your fault is less than 50%, at 50% or more you recover nothing. Maine is unusual in how it reduces a recovery: rather than cutting the award by a strict percentage of fault, the jury reduces the total damages in dollars to the extent it considers just and equitable given your share of responsibility. So a clean not-at-fault accident carries the full claim; shared fault reduces it, but not by a rigid percentage.
What is the statute of limitations for a Maine DV claim?
Six years from the accident under Maine's general civil statute of limitations, 14 M.R.S. § 752, which covers both property-damage and personal-injury claims. Six years is one of the longest windows in the country, far more time than most states allow. Even so, document early, comparable-sales evidence is strongest soon after the loss, and an expired claim recovers nothing.
Can I claim diminished value from my own insurance company in Maine?
Generally no. Maine diminished value is a third-party claim against the at-fault driver's insurer, and most first-party collision policies exclude DV. Whether your own uninsured/underinsured-motorist coverage would pay DV (if the at-fault driver was uninsured) is uncertain in Maine and depends on your policy, so read your declarations page and do not assume it. The reliable path is a third-party claim. Also, do not sign a release or cash a check marked "payment in full" for repairs, that can forfeit your DV claim.
Does Maine use the 17c formula?
No. The 17c formula came from Georgia's State Farm v. Mabry settlement and has no legal force in Maine. Maine measures the loss as the difference in the vehicle's value before and after the accident (Collins v. Kelley), so a credible market-based appraisal controls. An insurer quoting a 17c number in Maine is offering a negotiating floor, not applying Maine law.
Is a diminished value report worth it in Maine?
Yes. Maine's Collins v. Kelley requires proof that the value was actually diminished, repair cost alone is not conclusive, so a credible USPAP-grade appraisal with real Maine comparable-sales data is exactly what the claim needs. The report documents the before-and-after loss, satisfies the proof requirement, and anchors your demand. It is the most effective tool for moving an adjuster off a low 17c offer toward full recovery.
Will filing a diminished value claim raise my Maine insurance rates?
A third-party claim against the at-fault driver's insurer should not affect your premiums, because it is not a claim against your own policy and you were not at fault. Maine DV recovery is almost always third-party for this reason, so rate impact is typically not a concern. If you are unsure how your carrier treats not-at-fault claims, ask before filing.
What if I was also injured in the Maine crash?
The deadlines line up: both the property-damage (diminished value) claim and a personal-injury claim carry Maine's long 6-year statute of limitations (14 M.R.S. § 752). The same modified comparative-negligence rule applies to both, with its unusual dollars-not-percentage reduction. Coordinate the claims, and be careful that any settlement of the property/repair portion does not waive your remaining DV or injury claims.
⚡ Match Your Insurer

Now pull the playbook for the insurer on the other side of your claim

State Farm GEICO Progressive Allstate USAA Liberty Mutual Farmers Nationwide All Insurers →

Maine Recognizes Your Loss — Now Document It.

Maine case law already establishes that your before-and-after loss in value is recoverable from the at-fault driver's insurer, with repair cost not capping the claim, even after a flawless repair. You have six years, but the documented number is what wins. A USPAP-grade MyFairClaim appraisal proves the market loss that turns a recognized right into a real settlement, just keep the claim open and don't cash a "payment in full" repair check.

Nearby States

Diminished Value Claims in Neighboring States

📚 Keep Learning

Diminished value guides to strengthen your claim

What Is Diminished Value?How DV Is CalculatedDV vs DepreciationWriting a Demand LetterNegotiating Your ClaimWhere to Get a Report
Cookie preferences
You've been opted out of analytics and advertising cookies.