Home / States / North Dakota
📍 North Dakota · ⚠️ NOT a DV Recovery State · § 32-03-09.1 · Sullivan v. Pulkrabek (2000)

North Dakota Diminished Value Claims — The Complete Guide.

North Dakota is NOT a diminished value recovery state. N.D.C.C. § 32-03-09.1 + Sullivan v. Pulkrabek, 611 N.W.2d 162, 2000 ND 107 — limit recovery to the LESSER of (a) reasonable cost of repairs, OR (b) the diminution in market value. Once you have chosen one measure (typically repair cost), you have received the full measure of damages. Loss of use is also recoverable, but separate DV recovery on top of repair cost is foreclosed.

Recovery
NOT Recoverable
Statute of Limitations
6 Years
Small Claims Limit
$15,000 (Final)
Statute Limits Recovery
Lesser of Repair OR DV

Why North Dakota Limits DV Recovery — § 32-03-09.1 + Sullivan.

North Dakota stands apart from nearly every other state: by statute, recovery is limited to the LESSER of repair cost or diminution-in-value, not both. N.D.C.C. § 32-03-09.1 provides: "The measure of damages for injury to property caused by the breach of an obligation not arising from contract is presumed to be the reasonable cost of repairs necessary to restore the property to the condition it was in immediately before the injury was inflicted and the reasonable value of the loss of use pending restoration of the property, unless restoration of the property within a reasonable period of time is impossible or impracticable, in which case the measure of damages is presumed to be the difference between the market value of the property immediately before and immediately after the injury and the reasonable value of the loss of use pending replacement of the property."

The North Dakota Supreme Court in Sullivan v. Pulkrabek, 611 N.W.2d 162, 2000 ND 107 (2000), confirmed: "Because Sullivan has already chosen to receive the cost of repair over the diminution in value, he has received the full measure of damages under § 32-03-09.1." This forecloses the typical "both elements" recovery (repair cost + residual diminution) seen in most DV-recovery states. North Dakotans whose vehicles are repairable and where repairs restore the vehicle to pre-loss condition cannot recover additional residual diminution. The statute does allow recovery for loss of use during repairs.

⚠️ ND is not a DV recovery state
By statute (§ 32-03-09.1) and case law (Sullivan v. Pulkrabek), recovery is the LESSER of repair cost OR diminution. Once you choose one, you've received the full measure. The both-elements framework other states allow is foreclosed in North Dakota.

North Dakota Authority: § 32-03-09.1 + Sullivan v. Pulkrabek

ND DV recovery is foreclosed by statute and case law. Recovery is limited to the lesser of repair cost or diminution.

N.D.C.C. § 32-03-09.1 (Measure of Damages — Property Injury)
Statute limits recovery to lesser of repair cost or diminution.
N.D.C.C. § 32-03-09.1 provides that the measure of damages for property injury caused by tort is presumed to be the reasonable cost of repairs necessary to restore the property to its pre-injury condition AND the reasonable value of loss of use pending restoration — unless restoration is impossible or impracticable, in which case the measure shifts to difference in market value before and after injury plus loss of use. "Restoration of the property shall be deemed impracticable when the reasonable cost of necessary repairs and the reasonable value of the loss of use pending restoration is greater than the amount by which the market value of the property has been diminished."
✗ ND statute caps recovery at lesser of repair cost or diminution — not both.
Sullivan v. Pulkrabek, 611 N.W.2d 162, 2000 ND 107 (N.D. 2000)
ND Supreme Court confirms statute forecloses both-elements recovery.
The North Dakota Supreme Court in Sullivan v. Pulkrabek confirmed: "Because Sullivan has already chosen to receive the cost of repair over the diminution in value, he has received the full measure of damages under § 32-03-09.1. The statute also allows for recovery for loss of use; however, Sullivan concedes he was compensated for the loss of the use of his pickup. Thus, the district court did not err in granting Pulkrabek's motion for summary judgment." Once a ND claimant has chosen one measure, they have received the full measure of damages.
✗ Sullivan v. Pulkrabek confirms ND foreclosure. Choose repair cost or DV — not both.
N.D.C.C. § 28-01-16 (Statute of Limitations)
Six-year SOL for property damage tort actions.
North Dakota's SOL for property damage tort actions is six years under N.D.C.C. § 28-01-16 — among the longest SOL windows in the country (matching Maine, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Oregon, New Jersey). The long window is procedurally generous, but the substantive recovery is statutorily capped.
✓ 6-year SOL is generous — but recovery still capped by § 32-03-09.1.
ND Small Claims Court ($15,000 cap, NOT appealable)
Final small claims procedure with $15,000 cap.
North Dakota Small Claims Court handles claims up to $15,000. ND small claims judgments are NOT appealable — both parties accept the small claims decision as final. This is unusual procedure compared to most states where small claims allow appeal de novo. For higher-value claims or claims requiring appellate review, District Court is the path.
✗ ND small claims is FINAL — no appeal. Plan accordingly.

Why 17c is Even More Inappropriate in ND.

North Dakota's statutory framework caps recovery at the LESSER of repair cost or diminution. The 17c formula attempts to calculate a separate residual diminution figure, but ND statute forecloses recovering that on top of repair costs. Practical implication: ND DV claimants who have already received repair-cost compensation typically cannot recover additional DV. The 17c formula's typical output is therefore not meaningful in ND for repaired vehicles.

ND's statutory cap means traditional 17c calculations don't translate to additional recovery for repaired vehicles. Use the calculator for educational understanding, but recognize ND's unique constraints:

17c Formula Calculator
Run the 17c formula that most major auto insurers use to evaluate diminished value claims. Compare it against actual market-based loss.
17c Formula Result
$0
What the insurer will offer
Market-Based DV
$0
What you're actually owed
Note: Industry-standard formula not adopted by any state DOI.
Get a Defensible Market-Based Appraisal — $149.99

Filing a Property Damage Claim in North Dakota.

ND limits recovery to the LESSER of repair cost or diminution. Pursue full repair cost recovery + loss of use under § 32-03-09.1. Additional DV is statutorily foreclosed.

  1. Understand ND's unique statutory framework. N.D.C.C. § 32-03-09.1 + Sullivan v. Pulkrabek limit recovery to the LESSER of repair cost or diminution — not both. Repair cost is typically the higher figure for repairable vehicles.
  2. Document liability. ND applies modified comparative negligence with a 50% bar under N.D.C.C. § 32-03.2-02. Police report, witnesses, dashcam.
  3. Document full repair costs comprehensively. Get OEM-compliant repair estimates with calibration data, parts lists, and labor itemization. Repair cost is the recovery measure for repairable vehicles in ND.
  4. Recover loss of use. ND § 32-03-09.1 allows separate recovery for reasonable value of loss of use pending restoration. Document rental car costs and time without your vehicle.
  5. Consider total loss framing if appropriate. If the cost of repairs + loss of use exceeds the diminution in market value, the statute deems restoration "impracticable" — shifting the measure to pre-/post-injury market value plus loss of use. This may be the better path for severely damaged vehicles.
  6. Don't expect additional DV recovery on top of repair cost. Sullivan v. Pulkrabek forecloses this. Once you've received repair cost, you've received the full measure under § 32-03-09.1.
  7. Send a demand letter focused on repair cost + loss of use. Frame the demand around § 32-03-09.1's measures. Don't confuse the matter by demanding additional DV — ND statute forecloses it.
  8. File a North Dakota Insurance Department complaint if needed. insurance.nd.gov handles complaints. NDID complaints add regulatory pressure.
  9. Small Claims for $15,000 or less (FINAL — no appeal). ND Small Claims handles claims up to $15,000. Note: ND small claims judgments are NOT appealable. Both parties accept the decision as final.
  10. District Court for larger claims or claims requiring appellate review. Above $15,000 or for claims where appellate review may be needed, ND District Court handles the case with full procedure.
If your vehicle is severely damaged, consider total-loss framing
ND § 32-03-09.1 deems restoration "impracticable" when repair cost + loss of use exceeds market-value diminution. In that scenario, the measure shifts to pre-/post-injury market value — which may be the better recovery path for severely damaged vehicles.

North Dakota DV Questions

Can I recover diminished value in North Dakota?
Generally no. North Dakota is NOT a DV recovery state. N.D.C.C. § 32-03-09.1 and Sullivan v. Pulkrabek, 611 N.W.2d 162, 2000 ND 107 (N.D. 2000), limit recovery to the LESSER of repair cost or diminution-in-value — not both. Once you've received one measure, you've received the full measure.
What does N.D.C.C. § 32-03-09.1 say?
ND's property damage measure of damages statute. Recovery is the reasonable cost of repairs + loss of use during repairs. If restoration is impossible or impracticable, the measure shifts to difference in market value plus loss of use. "Impracticable" means repair cost + loss of use exceeds market-value diminution.
What is North Dakota's statute of limitations?
Six years from the date of the accident under N.D.C.C. § 28-01-16 — among the longest in the country. But the substantive recovery is still capped by § 32-03-09.1.
What is ND's small claims limit?
$15,000 in Small Claims Court. Note: ND small claims judgments are NOT appealable — both parties accept the decision as final. This is unusual procedure.
What if my vehicle is severely damaged?
If repair cost + loss of use exceeds diminution in market value, the statute deems restoration "impracticable" — shifting the measure to pre-/post-injury market value plus loss of use. This may be the better recovery path.
Why doesn't ND allow both-elements DV recovery?
By statute (N.D.C.C. § 32-03-09.1) and case law (Sullivan v. Pulkrabek), ND limits recovery to the lesser of repair cost or diminution. Most other states allow both repair cost AND residual diminution; ND does not.

Understand ND's Unique Limits.

North Dakota's statutory framework forecloses traditional DV recovery. Pursue full repair cost + loss of use under § 32-03-09.1. For severely damaged vehicles, total-loss framing under § 32-03-09.1's impracticability provision may be the better path.

Get Your Free Diminished Value Estimate

Our quick and simple appraisal process can help you recoup vehicle-related losses.