Home / States / Indiana
๐Ÿ“ Indiana ยท Third-Party DV State ยท Wiese-GMC v. Wells (1993) ยท 2-Year SOL ยท UMPD Covers DV

Indiana Diminished Value Claims — The Complete Guide.

Indiana has supported third-party DV recovery since Wiese-GMC v. Wells (Ind. Ct. App. 1993). The framework is well-established: pre-accident value minus post-repair value, with three permitted methods of proof. UMPD coverage can include DV. The catch: Allgood v. Meridian Security Insurance (Ind. 2005) forecloses first-party recovery, and the 2-year SOL under Ind. Code ยง 34-11-2-4 is one of the shorter windows.

Recovery
Third-Party + UMPD
Statute of Limitations
2 Years
Small Claims Limit
$10,000
Negligence Rule
Modified (51% bar)

Indiana's Three-Method Proof Framework.

Indiana's controlling case is Wiese-GMC, Inc. v. Wells, 626 N.E.2d 595 (Ind. Ct. App. 1993). The Court of Appeals laid out a clear framework: "the fundamental measure of damages in a situation where an item of personal property is damaged, but not destroyed, is the reduction in fair market value caused by the negligence of the tortfeasor." This reduction may be proved in three ways: (1) by evidence of fair market value before and fair market value after; (2) by evidence of the cost of repair where repair will restore property to its fair market value before; or (3) by cost of repair PLUS reduction in fair market value if repair doesn't fully restore.

Indiana's first-party path is foreclosed. Allgood v. Meridian Security Insurance Co., 836 N.E.2d 243 (Ind. 2005), held that an insurance policy providing coverage for loss limited to the lesser of actual cash value or amount necessary to repair or replace does not obligate the insurer to compensate for diminution after adequate repairs have been made. The Indiana Supreme Court denied transfer 5-0, making this controlling first-party authority. The framework is therefore third-party only via tort, with UMPD as an optional path for hit-and-run scenarios.

Indiana's three-method flexibility
Method 1: Before/after FMV. Method 2: Repair cost (if it restores value). Method 3: Repair cost PLUS residual diminution. Wiese-GMC v. Wells gives Indiana claimants flexibility in structuring proof.

Indiana Authority: Two Decisions, Different Directions

Indiana DV law has clear third-party authority and equally clear first-party foreclosure. The combination produces a tort-only recovery framework.

Wiese-GMC, Inc. v. Wells, 626 N.E.2d 595 (Ind. Ct. App. 1993)
Foundational Indiana third-party DV decision with three proof methods.
The Indiana Court of Appeals in Wiese-GMC v. Wells set out the controlling framework: "the fundamental measure of damages in a situation where an item of personal property is damaged, but not destroyed, is the reduction in fair market value caused by the negligence of the tortfeasor." The reduction can be proved by (1) before/after fair market value, (2) cost of repair where it restores value, or (3) cost of repair PLUS reduction in fair market value where repair doesn't fully restore. Wiese-GMC remains controlling Indiana third-party authority.
โœ“ Three-method flexibility under Wiese-GMC. Choose the method that fits your evidence.
Allgood v. Meridian Security Insurance Co., 836 N.E.2d 243 (Ind. 2005)
Indiana Supreme Court forecloses first-party DV under standard policies.
The Indiana Supreme Court in Allgood denied transfer with a 5-0 vote, finding that an insurance policy providing coverage for loss limited to the lesser of actual cash value or amount necessary to repair or replace property with other property of like kind and quality does NOT obligate the insurer to compensate for diminution in value after adequate repairs have been made. The decision foreclosed first-party DV recovery in Indiana under standard collision policies. The narrow exception: if repairs were inadequate, the insurer's contractual obligation may not be discharged.
โœ“ Allgood forecloses first-party. Pursue third-party via tort under Wiese-GMC instead.
Ind. Code ยง 34-11-2-4 (Statute of Limitations)
Two-year SOL for property damage tort actions.
Indiana's SOL for property damage tort claims is two years under Ind. Code ยง 34-11-2-4. This matches Texas, Pennsylvania, Kansas, Arizona, and Ohio as one of the shorter SOL windows. Practical implication: appraisal and demand should be completed within 18 months to leave 6 months buffer for any necessary litigation.
โœ“ 2-year deadline is firm. Don't let claims sit.
Ind. Code ยง 27-7-5-2 (UMPD Coverage)
Indiana UMPD may include DV as part of property damage coverage.
Indiana UMPD coverage at $25,000 per accident may include DV depending on policy language. UMPD is mandatory but can be rejected in writing. Critically โ€” and unusually โ€” Indiana UMPD coverage does NOT cover hit-and-run accidents (where the at-fault driver cannot be identified). Underinsured Motorist Property Damage at $25,000 may also include DV when at-fault liability coverage is inadequate.
โœ“ Indiana UMPD/UIMPD may cover DV. Verify policy. Note: UMPD doesn't cover hit-and-run in Indiana.

Indiana Insurers Use 17c — Wiese-GMC Doesn't.

Indiana's controlling standard from Wiese-GMC is market-based and offers three proof methods, including cost of repair PLUS residual diminution. The 17c formula's mechanical multipliers don't match this framework. Major Indiana insurers default to 17c when calculating initial offers. A demand letter quoting Wiese-GMC's three-method framework and citing Indiana's tort-only DV recovery posture (post-Allgood) puts the claim on solid Indiana appellate footing.

Run 17c first to anticipate the insurer's initial offer, then quantify the gap to Wiese-GMC's market-based standard:

17c Formula Calculator
Run the 17c formula that most major auto insurers use to evaluate diminished value claims. Compare it against actual market-based loss.
17c Formula Result
$0
What the insurer will offer
Market-Based DV
$0
What you're actually owed
Note: Industry-standard formula not adopted by any state DOI.
Get a Defensible Market-Based Appraisal โ€” $149.99

Filing a Diminished Value Claim in Indiana.

Indiana's framework is well-developed for third-party. The 2-year SOL means timing matters. UMPD provides backup for uninsured-driver scenarios (but not hit-and-run).

  1. Document liability. Indiana applies modified comparative negligence โ€” recovery barred at 51% or more fault. Police report, witnesses, dashcam, traffic camera footage.
  2. Determine recovery path. Three options: third-party against at-fault driver's liability insurer (most common), UMPD against your own policy if at-fault driver is uninsured (NOT hit-and-run; Indiana UMPD doesn't cover that), or UIMPD if at-fault liability coverage is inadequate.
  3. Complete repairs. Indiana DV is calculated post-repair under Wiese-GMC. Document repairs comprehensively.
  4. Establish pre-accident market value. Indiana-market comparables โ€” Indianapolis, Fort Wayne, Evansville, South Bend, Carmel, Bloomington. Indianapolis metro produces dense comparable data.
  5. Document post-repair value. Two written dealer trade-in offers post-repair plus comparable sales of similar Indiana vehicles with accident-history Carfax. Discount typically runs 12-22%.
  6. Prepare a USPAP-compliant appraisal. The appraisal cites Wiese-GMC v. Wells, references the three-method framework, and uses Indiana-market comparables. The appraisal should support whichever of the three methods you elect.
  7. Send a demand letter. Quote Wiese-GMC's three-method language. Elect Method 3 (repair cost PLUS residual diminution) when you can support both elements. Send certified mail.
  8. Allow 30 days for response. Indiana insurers familiar with Wiese-GMC typically respond within 14-30 days.
  9. File an Indiana Department of Insurance complaint. in.gov/idoi handles complaints. IDOI complaints add regulatory pressure.
  10. Small claims for $10,000 or less; circuit court above. Indiana small claims handles claims up to $10,000. Attorneys are permitted. Filing fees are modest. Above $10,000, circuit court handles the case with full procedure.
Indiana's UMPD limitation
Unlike most states, Indiana UMPD does NOT cover hit-and-run accidents (where the at-fault driver can't be identified). If you're in a hit-and-run, your DV recovery in Indiana is limited to whatever you can collect from the driver personally if later identified. Verify your specific policy language.

Indiana DV Questions

Can I recover diminished value in Indiana?
Yes, third-party only. Wiese-GMC, Inc. v. Wells, 626 N.E.2d 595 (Ind. Ct. App. 1993), is the controlling case. The Indiana Supreme Court foreclosed first-party recovery in Allgood v. Meridian Security Insurance Co., 836 N.E.2d 243 (Ind. 2005).
What is Indiana's three-method framework?
Under Wiese-GMC, the reduction in fair market value can be proved by: (1) evidence of pre- and post-accident fair market value, (2) cost of repair where it restores value, or (3) cost of repair PLUS reduction in fair market value where repair doesn't fully restore. Indiana claimants choose the method that fits their evidence.
What is Indiana's statute of limitations?
Two years from the date of the accident under Ind. Code ยง 34-11-2-4. One of the shorter SOLs among DV recovery states.
Does Indiana UMPD cover DV?
Possibly โ€” depending on policy language. Indiana UMPD ($25,000 limit) may include DV but does NOT cover hit-and-run accidents. Verify your specific policy.
What is Indiana's small claims limit?
$10,000 in small claims. Attorneys are permitted.
What if I'm partially at fault?
Indiana applies modified comparative negligence โ€” recovery is reduced by fault percentage but barred entirely at 51% or more. A claimant 30% at fault recovers 70% of DV; a claimant 51% at fault recovers nothing.

Three Methods. Pick Yours.

Indiana's Wiese-GMC framework gives claimants flexibility in structuring proof. A USPAP-compliant appraisal supporting your chosen method is the foundation.

Get Your Free Diminished Value Estimate

Our quick and simple appraisal process can help you recoup vehicle-related losses.